By Dr. Cole, FUE Hair Transplant Pioneer

FUT vs FUE Method

FUT VS. FUE HAIR TRANSPLANT COMPARISON - FACTS, SCARS, COST, AND HEALING

This article compares the two most prevalent hair transplant methods: FUT (Follicular Unit Transplantation) and FUE Hair Transplant (Follicular Unit Extraction). The former (FUT) is an older method that many surgeons practice. The latter (FUE), meanwhile, is the newest method available but also requires significant dedication to master.

People can feel hard-pressed to find reliable, unbiased info about hair restoration. Of course, such information is very important for deciding what procedure is right for you.

FUT vs FUE: Which Hair Transplant Technique is Right for You?

At Forhair, we are always upfront and honest for one simple reason: Cole Isolation Technique (CIT®), Dr. Cole’s innovative FUE variant, brings truly superior results. In fact, around 40% of Forhair’s patients seek Dr. Cole to repair hair transplant work from other clinics, both FUE and FUT.

Even great FUT and FUE procedures, however, have their own intricacies that patients should consider.

FUT Hair Transplant procedure

WHAT IS FOLLICULAR UNIT TRANSPLANTATION (FUT)?

FUT involves extracting a donor strip from a donor zone using a scalpel. The donor zone is usually an area on the sides and back of the scalp.

Once the donor strip is taken, it is split into individual grafts that are often smaller than follicular units. After this, surgeons transplant individual or small groups of follicles to recipient areas.

This procedure will always leave a linear scar from a few mm in diameter to over 5 mm in diameter. Unfortunately, the width of this scar is unpredictable before surgery.

WHAT IS FOLLICULAR UNIT EXTRACTION (FUE)?

At Forhair, we are always upfront and honest for one simple reason: Cole Isolation Technique (CIT®), Dr. Cole’s innovative FUE variant, brings truly superior results. In fact, around 40% of Forhair’s patients seek Dr. Cole to repair hair transplant work from other clinics, both FUE and FUT.

Even great FUT and FUE procedures, however, have their own intricacies that patients should consider.

FUE Hair Transplant Procedure

COMPARING SCARS AFTER PROCEDURE

FUE is outright the better choice for those who do not want noticeable scars. FUE scars are small and round, while FUT scars will always be long and linear. Scarring is less noticeable with FUE because scars are small, if noticeable at all, and scattered throughout the scalp. Scars from FUT is are bigger and localized, making them more noticeable.

FUE follicular unit extraction

In follow-up procedures from FUT, the hair is usually taken from the location leaving a single scar. Unfortunately, multiple FUT procedures increase the probability of a wide, noticeable scar. Multiple FUE procedures also thin the donor area over time.

However, the total number of possible grafts from FUE is often greater because hair does not need to be left to hide a wide scar. FUT also has a major disadvantage in that FUT can alter hair growth direction. This direction change may occur after one FUT procedure or multiple ones.FUT requires removal of a wide area of skin so the quality of the hair can vary on each side of the scar. Namely, hair above the scar is usually coarser than the hair on the bottom side of the scar. Changes in the hair growth direction and the contrast between fine hair to coarse hair can be quite visible with a short haircut.

FUE Traditional Follicular Unit Transplant

FUT OR STRIP (FOLLICULAR UNIT TRANSPLANT)

CIT (FOLLICULAR UNIT
EXTRACTION) - COLE FUE

C2G (NO SHAVE OR UNSHAVEN FUE) HAIR TRANSPLANT

HOW DO THE TIME AND COST COMPARE BETWEEN FUE AND FUT?

The cost of FUE will appear much higher than FUT because most FUE variants require a lot of time. After all, FUE surgeons extract and transplant follicles graft-by-graft. However, the cost per hair with FUE is often lower than FUT because you can expect 0.3 to 1.0 more hairs with each graft.

HOW DO ARTAS AND NEOGRAFT COMPARE TO CIT®?

Some clinics are using robotic or automated technology, namely ARTAS or Neograft, for FUE. Avoid these services. Not only costlier, clinics that offer ARTAS or Neograft often fail to produce high-quality grafts or convincing hairlines.

ARTAS and Neograft are often fallbacks for surgeons that have yet to master FUE or to deliver results that patients deserve. Neograft’s suction system is bad for the follicular graft’s health and the company is notorious for flying technicians with haphazard training to clinics for one-off procedures, oftentimes without any supervision from a doctor. ARTAS, meanwhile, leaves noticeable scars and charges its operators a $1 per graft royalty, significantly increasing costs. CIT®, in comparison, is both more affordable and more effective.

HOW IS HEALING DIFFERENT BETWEEN FUT AND FUE?

FUT leads to significant scabs and major soreness in the incision site. Healing in the first few days to a week can be rough and it is not uncommon for FUT recipients to enlist help around the house. FUT patients must also limit physical activity for the first month to prevent complications in the incision site.

FUE recovery, on the other hand, is often painless and patients rarely, if ever, require post-op assistance for day-to-day matters. There are some details patients must pay attention to, however. These include caring for donor areas, staying vertical for the first few days, and limiting physical activities during the first week of recovery.

FINAL CONCLUSION

FUE offers many benefits over FUT and is especially optimal for patients who:

What's Your Next Step?

Are you eager to explore your hair restoration possibilities? Get ready to take action against that frustrating bald spot or thinning hair today!

Contact TodayOnline Consultation