What Will You Learn?
The size of punches is an important subject in FUE hair transplant and CIT techniques.
It is also a strong marketing tool for some groups who attempt to mislead patients into believing that they can always use a small punch and they always get a high yield with little destruction to the follicles and follicular units.
We are perhaps the most experienced in follicular unit extraction at this time, with more than 300,000 grafts removed by our patented follicular isolation technique of extraction.
We rely on this vast amount of experience to help guide us in the art of follicular unit extraction.
The Misconception of FUE Punch Size
Patients generally believe that a smaller punch results in a smaller scar.
We believe this is not always the case.
It definitely has not been studied.
The general rule in skin surgery is that an incision smaller than 1.5 mm in size will heal without a visible scar to the naked eye.
Therefore, in theory, there should be no cosmetic advantage to a smaller incision than 1.25 mm in diameter or 1 mm in diameter.
There could be disastrous results from smaller incisions in regard to hair shaft damage.
Furthermore, the total number of hairs transferred by using smaller hair transplant punches can be significantly less.
What Patients Really Want
One must remember that individuals who have hair loss want hair in the areas where they do not have hair.
The advantage of FUE is that it allows us to leave an imperceptible scar in addition to adding hair to the areas of loss.
Adding hair can be efficient or inefficient.
In other words, for every 100 hairs you attempt to move, you may move 92 to 97 intact hairs, or you may move only 62 intact hairs.
The ones you do not move are damaged in the removal process.
The Efficiency Problem
If the damage ratio exceeds 8%, the process becomes very inefficient.
You will not get as much hair from every graft as you desire.
Your resulting coverage will be less.
Furthermore, you will pay more for less hair.
In general, punches smaller than 1.0 mm are good for one or two hair grafts.
If you attempt to move larger grafts than two hairs, your injury rate will increase, and your efficiency will decrease significantly.
The Correct Approach
In our office, we average 2.49 hairs per follicular unit using our method called follicular isolation.
This is about 25% more hair per graft than you can expect from the total use of a smaller punch.
Furthermore, we are able to keep the transection rate at 8% or less. Often it is 3%, which is better than with most strip surgeries.
We vary the punch size based on the size of the hair shafts and the number of hairs per follicular unit (technically referred to as the calculated density).
Understanding Hair Splay
The hairs exit from the scalp in natural clusters.
They are very close to one another on the surface.
On the surface, the clusters of hairs are bound closely into one or sometimes more than one follicular canal.
As they enter the skin, they begin to spread out.
In hair surgery, we call this “hair splay”.
The Flower Vase Analogy
A useful analogy is a bundle of flowers that are in a vase.
At the top of the vase, they are very close to one another.
As the flowers enter the vase, they progressively deviate from one another.
Some vases are narrower at the neck, and some are wider.
The wider ones will not gather the flowers as close to one another at the neck.
Some vases are wider at the base.
In the wider ones, the hairs will be farther apart; there will be more splay or distance between the individual flower stems.
On a more narrow basis, the flowers will be much closer to one another.
There will be less splay or distance between the individual stems.
Hair Follicle Variation
The same thing happens with the scalp’s donor area.
In some individuals, there will be a wide variety of narrow bundles.
In other individuals, there will be a preponderance of follicular units exhibiting splay.
In other individuals, there will be a variety of bundles.
Some have more splay than others, and some have very little splay.
The Follicular Size
Another concept to understand is the size of the hair follicles and their surrounding dermal sheath.
The average scalp follicle is 0.42 mm wide from the dermal sheath to the dermal sheath.
The Math Behind Punch Selection
This means you can use a 0.5 mm punch all you want, but the two hair follicular units will not fit into it.
In other words, you will need a little luck in your extraction process, a perfect incision, and no margin for error.
You will have a lower yield and an inefficient procedure.
A 0.75 mm punch will work, but the incision must be perfect.
Humans are not always perfect.
A 0.8 mm punch will work on the 2 hair follicular units as well, but the human must also be perfect.
The 0.9 mm punch provides a larger cushion, and we have used it quite often for 2 hair grafts, but it is not possible to use it on every patient or every 2 hair grafts.
The 1 mm punch provides a larger cushion for human error and a very high yield with most grafts and in most individuals.
Larger Follicular Units
As the size of the follicular unit increases, the width also increases.
This can present an increasing problem for the hair restoration surgeon.
In our office, the average follicular unit has 2.49 hairs.
Therefore, we must tailor the punch to the patient and to the follicular unit.
The Customization Principle
In other words, if you want a more efficient procedure, the procedure must be customized to the patient and the follicular units.
Otherwise, you will have a far lower efficiency ratio and a lower yield.
You will pay more for less hair, and you will unnecessarily put donor hairs at risk.
The ideal donor result is important, but the yield should be a chief consideration for the hair restoration surgeon and the patient.
Scar Formation Observations
To date, we have not noted an increase in scar formation from the use of larger punches.
Larger punches have not shown more collateral damage or shock loss to the surrounding hairs in the surrounding follicular units.
This has not been studied yet, however.
Dr. Cole’s comparative research on 0.75mm versus 1.25mm punches found no difference in hypopigmentation appearance when intact follicular units were properly extracted.
The main problem with follicular unit extraction remains the removal of a follicular unit from the natural follicular geometry of the donor area.
This problem is the same regardless of punch size.
Current Industry Standards (2025)
What Size Punches Do Surgeons Actually Use?
According to the 2024 ISHRS Practice Census, current punch size distribution among hair restoration surgeons shows:
- 50.8% use 0.81 mm to 0.90 mm punches
- 38.0% use 0.91 mm to 1.00 mm punches
- Less than 12% use punches smaller than 0.81 mm
This data reveals that experienced surgeons are choosing larger punch sizes than what “micro-punch” marketing often suggests.
Why Larger Punches Are Trending
There are five key reasons why surgeons have shifted toward appropriately sized (not necessarily smaller) punches:
1. Reduced transection rates
Proper-sized punches provide margin for human error, reducing follicle damage.
2. Surgeon crew experience levels
As procedures scale, having appropriate punch sizes ensures consistent results.
3. Increased procedure speed
Modern motorized devices work more efficiently with optimal-sized punches.
4. Improved wound healing methods
Advanced techniques have made larger punches (0.8-1.0mm) as safe as smaller ones.
5. Better surgical outcomes
Surgeons report superior results with size-matched punches versus universally small punches.
Modern Technology Developments
Since this article was originally written in 2006, hair transplant technology has evolved significantly:
Robotic-Assisted FUE: Systems like ARTAS have been introduced, but show highly variable transection rates from 0.4% to 32.1% , a massive range that indicates inconsistent results. The average robotic transection rate of 4-6% often exceeds what experienced manual surgeons achieve routinely.
Motorized Extraction Devices: When used by skilled surgeons with proper technique, motorized devices can increase extraction speed while maintaining low transection rates.
Advanced Punch Materials: Sapphire and titanium punches provide sharper, cleaner incisions when properly designed.
DHI (Direct Hair Implantation): The Choi Implanter Pen technique has gained some popularity, though results remain highly dependent on operator skill.
The fundamental principle remains unchanged: technology cannot replace surgical expertise, and punch size must match follicular anatomy.
Transection Rate Benchmarks
Research on transection rates shows:
- Complete transection rate: 8.08% ± 6.98% (average)
- Partial transection rate: 16.78% ± 12.01% (average)
- Expert surgeons: Often achieve 2-5% transection rates
- Acceptable standard: Under 5% is considered excellent
“Hidden transection” – damage that occurs beneath the scalp surface, is now recognized as an important factor, with expert surgeons showing 2% hidden transection versus 8% for beginners.
The Cole Isolation Technique (CIT®)
The Cole Isolation Technique is Dr. John Cole’s proprietary follicular unit extraction method, pioneered in 2002 and continuously refined.
CIT Core Principles
Why CIT Works
Dr. Cole was the first physician to use a punch smaller than 1 mm in 2002 and created the only patented instruments with depth control available.
The technique involves using sharp punches ranging from 0.75 mm to 1.25 mm in diameter, selected based on individual patient characteristics.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does a smaller punch always mean a smaller scar?
No. Research shows that incisions smaller than 1.5mm heal without visible scarring to the naked eye.
There is no proven cosmetic advantage between a 0.7mm and 1.2mm punch when properly executed.
What matters more is surgeon technique, extraction density, and proper spacing.
What is an acceptable transection rate?
Medical literature considers 5% an acceptable transection rate.
However, experienced surgeons using proper technique routinely achieve:
- 3-5% transection rates with customized punch sizing
- Under 3% in optimal conditions
- 8% or less consistently across all hair types
How many hairs per graft should I expect?
Industry average: 1.62 to 2.0 hairs per follicular unit
With CIT and proper punch sizing: 2.49 hairs per follicular unit
This 25-35% difference significantly impacts coverage in large sessions.
Should I choose a clinic based on their punch size?
No. Judge clinics based on:
- ✅ Surgeon credentials and experience
- ✅ Actual transection rates (not just punch size claims)
- ✅ Graft survival rates (should be 90%+)
- ✅ Before-and-after results from similar patients
- ✅ Customized approach to your hair characteristics
Avoid clinics that:
❌ Don’t discuss transection rates or graft survival data
❌ Market exclusively on “micro-punch” size
❌ Use one punch size for all patients
Can punch size prevent future hair loss?
No. Punch size only affects:
- Extraction efficiency and graft survival
- Donor area scar appearance
- Number of intact follicles harvested
It does NOT affect:
- Medical causes of hair loss
- Ongoing pattern baldness progression
- Age-related thinning
What about different hair types?
Hair characteristics significantly impact optimal punch size:
Straight hair: Standard 0.8-1.0mm punches work well
Curly hair: May require 0.9-1.1mm punches to accommodate curl
Afro-textured hair: Often requires specialized curved punches due to subcutaneous follicle curl patterns, with transection rates under 5% when proper tools are used.
Fine hair: May allow smaller punches for single-hair grafts
Coarse hair: Often requires larger punches (1.0-1.25mm) for multi-hair units
How does surgeon fatigue affect results?
Research shows that transection rates increase significantly during long procedures:
- Start of procedure: 4.4-5.7 transections/cm²
- End of procedure: 24.2-27.7 transections/cm²
This is why:
- Procedure length matters
- Surgeon experience is critical
- Mega-sessions (3,000+ grafts) require exceptional skill
- Team support and technology assistance help maintain consistency
Key Takeaways
The Essential Principles
1. Size matching is crucial.
The punch must accommodate the follicular unit width, not be arbitrarily small.
2. Customization beats uniformity.
The best results come from varying punch size based on individual hair characteristics.
3. Efficiency determines value.
Low transection rates mean more transplanted hair and better coverage.
4. Scars are similar across appropriate sizes.
Punches from 0.75mm to 1.25mm heal with similar scar appearance when properly spaced.
5. Experience matters more than equipment.
Surgeon skill and technique trump punch size alone.
6. Industry standards favor larger punches.
89% of surgeons use 0.81-1.0mm punches, not “micro-punches.”
What to Remember
- Smaller doesn’t automatically mean better
- Marketing claims about punch size can be misleading
- Transection rate and graft yield are more important metrics
- Your hair characteristics should determine punch selection
- Donor supply is finite — efficiency protects your long-term options
.
