HAIR TRANSPLANT FORUM

Like most guys, I'm amazed at Wassup's results (such a great result couldn't have happened to a nicer guy, btw). The thing is, ISN'T there something about his hair density or hair type that allowed this result in him but not in the average guy? Wassup's result is almost legendary on the internet hairloss forums. If there were nothing unusual about it, it seems like there would be countless others like it (especially here on Forhair). The other results on display here on Forhair, while clearly excellent, don't approach that of Wassup, in my opinion. Believe me, if I could duplicate Wassup's result just by showing up at Dr Cole's office with the money (over the course of several years, as Wassup did), I'd make it happen. But, in my consultation with Dr Cole, I didn't get the impression that I should shoot that high. I felt like I should shoot for the more modest (but, again, still great) results of the other Cole patients in the photo gallery. Admittedly, I didn't say, "What must I do to get a result like Wassup?" Maybe I should have. I would even be willing to go the "farming" route to get the most out of my donor supply if I thought I could get there from here.

So, let me ask plainly, did Wassup have a higher than normal donor supply, or better than normal hair characteristics that allowed Dr Cole to work his magic and achieve a result that is even more impressive than Dr Cole's typically impressive work?