|
There are several indications in the literature suggesting that severe
psycho-emotional stress may cause the onset of alopecia areata.40–42
Also, it has been long debated whether or not environmental or psychosocial
stressors can significantly influence hair growth.13,43–46 First
systematic studies to address this intriguing question have been recently
performed by Hair Research Laboratory of R. Paus (University of Hamburg,
Hamburg, Germany) and a neuroimmunological group with strong focus on
stress-triggered dysbalances of physiological homeostasis led by P. Arck
(Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany).47 Investigators showed that
in mice audiogenic (sonic) stressor induces appearance of apoptotic cells in
resting hair follicles and inhibits keratinocyte proliferation.47
Furthermore, sonic stressor causes significant changes in skin immune system:
increase of number of activated perifollicular macrophage cluster and mast cell
degranulation, as well as down-regulation of intraepithelial T
cells.47 Interestingly, these changes could be abrogated by
administration of selective substance P receptor antagonist suggesting
involvement of substance P in realization of hair follicle response to
stressor.47
In the article published in the current issue of The American Journal of
Pathology, Arck and colleagues48 follow- up their previous work and
provide further evidence for existence of "brain-hair follicle axis." They show
that audiogenic stress also induces significant changes in actively growing hair
follicles and promotes their transition into the involution phase. Premature
termination of hair follicle growth induced by stressor is associated with
up-regulation of keratinocyte apoptosis, increased mast cell degranulation, and
appearance of perifollicular inflammatory infiltrates of activated
macrophages.48 Furthermore, the authors show that most of these hair
growth-inhibitory effects of stressor can be reproduced in nonaffected mice by
administration of substance P, whereas substance P receptor antagonist reduces
the stress-induced hair growth inhibition.
Interestingly, Arck and colleagues48 describe the increase of
close contacts between substance P-containing nerve fibers and mast cells in
skin after stressor exposure. Mast cell-nerve associations in skin have been
noticed previously during the normal hair cycle49 and also in a
variety of pathological situations including wound healing, atopic dermatitis,
and psoriasis.6,50 Substance P is a potent mast cell secretagogue and
may stimulate the release of proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis
factor-by mast cells.19,22 Importantly, CRH released during the
stress response is also capable of inducing mast cell
degranulation.51,52 These data suggest that mast cells are important
local modulators of the hair follicle response to stress exposure and raise a
possibility to speculate that inhibitors of mast cell secretory activity may
also be effective to prevent stress-induced hair growth alterations.
The exciting data presented by Arck and colleagues48 also raises
several intriguing questions about the mechanisms involved in the hair follicle
response induced by audiogenic stressor. It seems interesting to define whether
substance P plays a major role in mediating the effects of audiogenic stress on
the hair follicle, or other components of the systemic and local stress response
(CRH, proopiomelanocortin peptides, glucocorticoid hormones, autonomic
neurotransmitters) are also involved in stress-associated hair growth
inhibition. Also, the cellular targets for substance P in the hair follicle
during the stress response remain to be determined. In addition, it seems to be
logical to ask which apoptotic pathways are activated in hair follicle
keratinocytes after stress exposure and whether or not audiogenic stress also
stimulates apoptosis in hair follicle melanocytes. Most importantly, data
presented by Arck and colleagues48 provides a model of
depilation-induced hair cycle as a tool for researchers to further investigate
the molecular mechanisms of hair follicle response to stress exposure.
Hopefully, use of this model would bring important new knowledge into our
understanding of stress-induced hair loss and would help to design in the near
future new approaches for the treatment of stress-associated hair growth
disturbances.
|